Species of Library Classification Schemes: Enumerative Vs. Faceted

Species of Library Classification Schemes:

Library classification schemes are systems used to organize books and other materials in a library according to subject matter. The classification system helps in arranging materials in a logical, systematic manner to aid users in locating resources efficiently. There are several types of library classification schemes, broadly categorized into Enumerative vs. Faceted and General vs. Special.

---

1. Enumerative vs. Faceted Classification:

Enumerative Classification:

Definition: An enumerative classification system organizes knowledge by listing all the possible subjects or topics and assigns a specific number or symbol to each category. The system is predefined and exhaustive, meaning it attempts to cover every possible subject within the chosen domain.

Characteristics:

Predefined structure: The system is based on a fixed hierarchy, and each subject is placed within a clearly defined category.

No flexibility for new topics: As new subjects or topics emerge, they may require reorganization or extension of the system.

Examples:

Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC): One of the most widely used systems, listing all possible subjects in a hierarchical order (e.g., 500s for natural sciences).

Library of Congress Classification (LCC): Used primarily in academic libraries, providing a classification system based on disciplines.

Advantages:

Provides a clear and consistent structure.

Easier to follow and organize library materials in a predictable manner.

Disadvantages:

Rigid and not very adaptable to new fields or emerging disciplines.

Can be difficult to assign a subject to a specific category if it overlaps multiple topics.

---

Faceted Classification:

Definition: A faceted classification system organizes subjects based on several independent facets or characteristics, allowing a more flexible and multi-dimensional categorization. Each facet represents a different attribute of the subject, and they can be combined in various ways to classify resources.

Characteristics:

Flexibility: Facets can be rearranged or modified to accommodate new subjects.

Dynamic: It allows the system to adapt and expand with new topics, as facets can be added without major revisions to the entire system.

Examples:

Colon Classification: Developed by S.R. Ranganathan, it uses facets like Personality, Matter, Energy, etc., to categorize knowledge.

Facet Analytical Classification: Used in systems where the relationship between different facets is more important than hierarchical order.

Advantages:

Highly adaptable and flexible.

Can better handle subjects that cross multiple domains.

Disadvantages:

More complex to use and understand for library users and staff.

Requires more effort in classification due to multiple facets that need to be considered.

---

2. General vs. Special Classification:

General Classification:

Definition: A general classification system is designed to classify a wide range of topics across many different disciplines. It aims to provide a comprehensive, all-encompassing system for organizing materials from all subject areas.

Characteristics:

Broad Coverage: General systems are intended for all types of materials, regardless of discipline or subject matter.

Flexible and adaptable: They are designed to accommodate a variety of fields and are frequently used in public libraries and other general collections.

Examples:

Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC): It is a general system used worldwide in libraries, including public libraries, to categorize all types of knowledge.

Library of Congress Classification (LCC): While it is more commonly used in academic libraries, it is also considered a general classification system.

Advantages:

Works well for libraries that need to organize a diverse set of materials across various disciplines.

Provides a uniform structure across a large variety of subjects.

Disadvantages:

Can be less specific or detailed for particular fields or disciplines.

Not always suited for specialized or niche collections.

---

Special Classification:

Definition: A special classification system is created for a specific subject, field, or domain. These systems are tailored to meet the needs of specialized libraries or collections that deal with particular topics.

Characteristics:

Narrow Scope: These systems are focused on specific subjects like law, medicine, or art.

Detail-Oriented: They allow for more in-depth classification and often use a more detailed and specific hierarchy.

Examples:

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): Used for classifying materials in the medical field.

Universal Decimal Classification (UDC): Although it can be used in general libraries, it is frequently adapted for special or technical libraries.

Advantages:

Provides more specific and detailed classification for specialized fields.

Well-suited for niche collections and subject-specific libraries.

Disadvantages:

Less adaptable for libraries with diverse collections.

May require more specialized knowledge for proper classification.

---

Summary of Differences:

---

In conclusion, enumerative vs. faceted classification schemes differ in structure and flexibility, with enumerative systems providing a rigid, hierarchical order and faceted systems offering adaptability. General vs. special classification schemes differ in their scope, with general systems covering broad areas of knowledge and special systems focusing on specific fields. Each has its own strengths and is suited for different types of libraries and collections.